Failure in real science is good – and different from phony controversies
Real scientific controversies play out in the scientific literature, through papers drawing on many other sources of data.
…
Phony controversies tend to play out in the media, through press releases, stump speeches, and polemical writing reshared via social media.
Somewhat related: something I wrote a while back. Each step along the way of doing the science increases your confidence, but ultimately what you need in any scientific finding is confirmation of a result.
Once the weight of experimental result hits a certain critical mass, the expectations swing away from needing data to confirm a theory to needing exceptional data to disprove it.
